The Reliability of the Clinical Tests and Questions Recommended in International Guidelines for Low Back Pain
The Reliability of the Clinical Tests and Questions Recommended in International Guidelines for Low Back Pain
April 24, 2007
The Week in Chiropractic
Study Design. An intertester reliability study of the questions and tests recommended in guidelines for the management of low back pain (LBP).
Objective. This study undertook a reliability study to evaluate the reliability of the items of the LBP clinical examination with a large sample of LBP patients.
Summary of Background Data. A crucial part of the diagnostic triage process, recommended by many national and international guidelines for the management of LBP, is the clinical examination. The questions and tests used in this process have never been rigorously evaluated for their intertester reliability in first contact clinicians who are not medically trained.
Methods. Patients, referred to physiotherapy departments across the United Kingdom with LBP (n = 301) were recruited in a sample of convenience. The 50 questions and physical tests were administered by a physiotherapist and then repeated by another physiotherapist within the same day. Data were analyzed using kappa and weighted kappa correlation coefficients ([kappa]). Confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.
Results. Eighty-six percent (n = 43) of the questions and test demonstrated [kappa] of 0.41 (fair agreement) or above. Five questions and 2 physical tests (prone knee bend and myotomal assessment) demonstrated agreement of only slight levels. CIs were generally narrow and the uncertainty regarding the kappa coefficients demonstrated correspondingly low.
Conclusions. This study has rigorously evaluated the intertester reliability of the clinical examination process of the diagnostic triage. These clinicians generally demonstrated fair agreement when testing features of the "nerve root," "yellow" and "red flag" presentations recommended in international guidelines for the management of LBP and nonspecific LBP. However, reliance on single tests with only fair levels of agreement may be unwise. Further work is required to investigate the validity of the tests.
McCarthy CJ, et al. Spine. April 15, 2007; Vol. 32, Iss. 8, pp. 921-926.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Inclusion of information in The Week in Chiropractic does not imply endorsement from FCER nor does inclusion imply agreement with FCERÌs views.
For a complete copy of an article abstracted in "Research Review," please check your local medical or chiropractic college library. Articles may also be ordered from FCERÌs Literature Search Service at 800-743-3282.
Copyright 2007 Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research
You can reprint any part of this newsletter with the following attribution: ÏReprinted with permission of the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, The Week in Chiropractic. Subscribe for free at www.fcer.org.



Votes:0